By: Episode 27 – Fake and Vulgar – The Truth Paid Bare – Unintended...
[…] Pierre L. Gosselin, 2014 […]
View ArticleBy: NASA, You Have A Problem – Menopausal Mother Nature
[…] 2012 No Tricks Zones‘ Pierre Gosselin described, with evidence, how Hansen continued to “massage” US temperature data to (again) […]
View ArticleBy: NASA, You Have a Problem – Quadrant Online
[…] 2012 No Tricks Zones‘ Pierre Gosselin described, with evidence, how Hansen continued to “massage” US temperature data to (again) […]
View ArticleBy: Dr Roger Higgs
Pierre, I greatly admire your website. I agree 100% with your ‘About’ introduction above. Your comment ‘In fact, if the media hadn’t hyped up the climate, most people wouldn’t have noticed any “climate...
View ArticleBy: Kick Honijk
Dear Pierre Gosselin, During this month of December 2018, after the signing of the Marrakesh Compact , there is a lot of discussion going on in the Netherlands about global Warming (or not). Today, I...
View ArticleBy: yupasofuw
side effect of tab thyroxine, symptoms of too much thyroxine nhs <a href="http://thyroxine.medinfoblog.com" rel="nofollow">thyroxine dog cholesterol deposits</a> - can an overdose of...
View ArticleBy: P Gosselin
Thanks. I decide who frustrates me and who doesn’t, and all the stupidity doesn’t frustrate that much. I feel like we are winning and making very good progress.
View ArticleBy: Interested parties
Thanks Pierre. I appreciate your efforts, and your fight against such large forces. I’m sure the mainstream climate science community doesn’t even know you exist or listen to your arguments, and that...
View ArticleBy: Gregg Kolpin
Thanks for all the work you do Pierre. I just shared an article of yours that displayed the enormous amount of scientific research completed in 2017 that didn’t agree with AGW alarmism. I am a member...
View ArticleBy: howard brady
– Breaking News – Two leading US scientists acclaim Australian climate book Two leading USA scientists have acclaimed a little known book for its remarkable ability to show everyday people, not just...
View ArticleBy: David Pristash
You maybe interested in a climate model I built over the past dozen years. I provided you a link to a monthly report I publish on my website. which describes my model and methods. I’ll be updating it...
View ArticleBy: aleks
About the global warming conception. It seems to me, that in order to debunk this conception, it’s necessary to check the correctness of the idea about ability of CO2 and other “greenhouse gases” to...
View ArticleBy: yonason
@ R J 19. August 2013 at 8:25 PM “Conservative media makes people distrust scientists…” I’m a scientist, and I trust most Conservative media. What I distrust are activists pretending to be scientists...
View ArticleBy: Jim Smith
Have you ever researched or come across any analysis that proves climate change is not affected by the earth’s core when considering 1) it is estimated (because no one knows for sure) to be 10000...
View ArticleBy: Kevin Hearle
Hi have you seen this it blows IPCC CO2 induced GW away New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model Ned Nikolov* and...
View ArticleBy: Peter Ravenscroft
G’day Pierre, Very impressed with your work, thanks on behalf of one and all. I have likewise been at this lot for over a decade, mostly from the angle of maps and geomagnetics, which I am fairly sure...
View ArticleBy: Kenneth Richard
“The 16 ppmv/K is rock solid, established over 200 years ago by Henry and confirmed by over 3 million seawater samples.” And yet despite restating this again and again and again, 16 ppmv/K...
View ArticleBy: Ferdinand Engelbeen
Kenneth, You simply don’t understand what I wrote, that is why I didn’t respond anymore, as that is a waste of time. 1. The 16 ppmv/K is rock solid, established over 200 years ago by Henry and...
View Article
